Acts of War Part 1: protecting child rapists

ByActs of War are often invasions of peaceful countries but the present incidence of Muslims raping young white girls must be considered an Act of War as it is carried out by a separate and homogenous community imported into our country by the deceit of the elites against the interests of the indigenous people.

Can anyone imagine the great Henry John Temple, 3rd Viscount Palmerston allowing aliens to gang rape our young girls? In 1850, for the assault on British subject Don Pacifico in Greece, a foreign country, he sent the navy and blockaded their ports Greece was under the joint protection of three powers: Russia and France protested against its coercion by the British fleet and the French ambassador temporarily left London. It was the cause of Palmerston’s declaration that British subjects ought everywhere to be protected by the strong arm of the British government against injustice and wrong; comparing the reach of the British Empire to that of the Roman Empire, in which a Roman citizen could walk the earth unmolested by any foreign power.

This was the famous, five-hour speech Civis Britannicus, in which he delivered himself of this sentiment:

“As the Roman, in days of old, held himself free from indignity, when he could say, Civis Romanus sum, so also a British subject, in whatever land he may be, shall feel confident that the watchful eye and the strong arm of England will protect him from injustice and wrong.”

The low and worthless rulers we have now even cover up for aliens raping our young girls in our own towns and cities. Just compare girly Michael Gove with this great man. What an embarrassment! The sight of the elites on the BBC’s Question Time talking away this reality to cover it up was sickening.  They:

(1) unanimously agreed Jack Straw was a racist for hinting that Pakistani males are serial sex offenders against young white girls, and would not even discuss the reality;

(2) didn’t mention that Pakistani women must be virgins at marriage and risk assault or death if they step out of line.

Michael Gove was a prig, and the ultra-orthodox Jeanette Winterson of course made her feminist points. She is a “hater” - but only of fashionable targets like white males. I suggest you read her books to see what she thinks of men. Are these vile liars and cowards our representatives? Do they speak for us? No, we must protect our people ourselves and campaign to protect young white girls from the alliance of secrecy between the degenerate elites and Muslim child-rapists. When does the fight back start to protect our people - Now!

Events that might cause us to revolt are kept quiet at first. But if the truth comes out they try to nullify its effects. This is why Muslim child-rapists are classed as criminals. We must be encouraged to think they are the same as white paedophiles. But they are from a different community and never do it to their own, only other communities children like whites and Sikhs.

The police and social services kept these activities quiet for years and even tried to sue Channel 4 to stop them exposing it. The late Colin Cramphorn, CBE, QPM, DL, FRSA, Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, told a public meeting that we must “learn to live” with the rapes of young white children. Instead of doing their duty to combat crime the local police forces aided and abetted these evil crimes by
covering them up.

Cramphorn none too gently persuaded Channel 4 to postpone its investigation Edge of the City as it would “increase community tensions” in the run up to local and European elections in 2004.  He didn’t do that because there was no charge to answer:

More than a year in the making, Edge of the City follows social workers with difficult cases in one inner city.

The most controversial of these witnesses authorities and parents trying to stop groups of young men who are grooming girls as young as 11 for sex.

Although none of the officials in the film raise race as the issue in these predatory relationships, the filmmakers make it perfectly clear that the abusers are predominantly Asian, and all of the abused girls are white.

This is the controversy at the heart of the film which cries out for explanation. But instead, the story is shoe-horned into 90 minutes, along with those of an elderly man fighting for independence, a troubled couple dealing with disability and alcoholism and a trainee social worker’s determination to help a serial teenager offender.

The recent, belated expose of the extent of Muslims gang-raping young white girls has at last brought this evil into the public consciousness. Progressives are trying to remove its sting: nullify it by adapting it to their unworldly ideology. If they do not Whites would start to revolt and there are a lot more of us. Its only by controlling what people are allowed to know that keeps the masses passive; even welfare entitlements and employing a large per cent of the population could lose their force if people knew it was a rival ethnic community that is raping young children. Some recalcitrant facts could not be swayed away and remain: The Times investigation is based around 56 men convicted in the Midlands and north of England since 1997, 50 from Muslim backgrounds. Muslim men even hang around outside school gates looking for young White girls to drug and rape, but no teacher speaks out.

Former Labour MP Ann Cryer provoked an attempt to hide the truth in 2003 when she said the traditional culture of arranged marriages could have caused a criminal minority of Asian men to target vulnerable young white girls for sex.  No, but the gang-raping of minors is criminal and the police and social services aided and abetted these predators by covering up.

Another attempt to falsify reality came from Mohammed Shafiq, director of the Lancashire-based Ramadhan Foundation, said last year:

“I think the police are overcautious because they are afraid of being branded racist. These men are criminals and should be treated as criminals - whatever their race.”

This is the same excuse the Government used for IRA terrorists. That those political terrorists were criminals. We really must not take any notice of this cowardly twaddle.

In the Netherlands young white girls are gang-raped and used for prostitution by Moroccan pimps, known as ‘loverboys’. Sweden is the rape capital of Europe – well, the Muslim parts are.

To sample the official “conspiracy of silence” that allows hundreds of vulnerable white girls in some towns to be abused by Asian men: Ajmal Mohamed, a 43-year-old from Blackburn. In 2004, Mohammed, took a schoolgirl to a Manchester hotel room and got her drunk to celebrate her 14th birthday. The child ran away. Police were called, but he denied having sex with her and they issued him with a “child abduction warning letter”. They allowed it to continue. He was never prosecuted.

Two years later, Mohammed took another 14-year-old to a hotel room in Blackpool and did rape this one. When the police arrested him they found the phone numbers of six other vulnerable young girls on his mobile phone. The police who let him off the first time have personal responsibility for the second attack and must be held accountable.

In industrial towns across the North and the Midlands, in just three years 51 people have been convicted in trials involving groups of men who have picked up young girls for gang-raping and sexual exploitation. Forty-eight of the offenders were Asian; the vast majority of the victims were white. Recently, in Derby, nine men, eight of them Asian, were sentenced for their parts in a gang that groomed, sexually exploited and in some cases raped 27 local children, 22 of them white.

In 2006, Blackburn’s local paper, the Lancashire Telegraph, launched a “Keep Them Safe” campaign to make the authorities tackle what it called “sexual grooming and abduction - which predominantly involves Asian men”. In article after article, the paper charted locals’ frustration at officials refusal to do what they are paid for and help the girls. In 2007, the Lancashire Telegraph reported, that some parents had threatened to sue the police for their failure to act. The editor, Kevin Young, said: “This is an extremely sensitive subject, and the Telegraph gave it a lot of consideration before launching its campaign.” They should sue the police for covering the widespread rape of children up.

Like the liars on QT the judiciary takes the side of foreign sex attackers. In October 2007 evil Judge Sir Henry Hodge stopped the deportation of a serial sex attacker because it would breach his human right to a family life. Hodge was an immigration judge busy trying to destroy our country. The foreigner admitted indecently assaulting 11 women in the previous five years and has committed a string of other offences including robbery, burglary, arson and drugs.

Hodge, who was the husband of the one-time paedophile-embroiled Labour politician and former minister Margaret Hodge, ruled he should be allowed to stay because he came to the UK at the age of six and has almost no family left in West Africa. To support his decision, he cited article eight of the Human Rights Act, which gives a person the right to a family life. Thats it! Family life for vile perverts but ruined lives for the victims and no legal catharsis offered.

Another evil judge sentenced Stuart Wood, with previous convictions for violence and indecent assault on young girls, to just seven years for a vicious rape, then praised him for converting to Islam:

You have turned to Islam and this promises well for your future, particularly as you are now an adherent of a religion which respects women and self-discipline.”

Under Sharia Law, rape can only be proven if the rapist confesses or if there are four male witnesses. Women who allege rape, without the benefit of the act having been witnessed by four men who subsequently develop a conscience, are taken as confessing to having sex.

It is true that white paedophiles travel to Thailand to practise their perversion. Thailand is degenerate for allowing its children to be degraded and the perverted whites who go there to abuse children must be punished as severely as the Muslims who do it here must. These are crimes against a different ethnic group, the “other”.

It is true, too, that Catholic priests abused children and the Catholic authorities covered it up. But the Muslim issue is different. The abuse is to white girls and the responsible authorities whom the white majority vote for and pay for cover it up.

These girls are being raped and then groomed for prostitution. To Muslims whites are less than human.  They dehumanised us with terms like Kuffar and Infidel. They hook young White girls on drugs and alcohol, and emotionally torture them. This is not about sex: If they wanted sex they could buy the services of prostitutes. They are easy to find and advertise. Why instead of that do they use drugs, alcohol and mental degradation on those girls and pass them around like pieces of meat? It is using our young women as the spoils of war. The deliberate degredation of non-Muslims, unbelievers, infidels? To emphasise the power, the supremacy, of Islam?

Anybody who has looked into the eyes of someone howling with pain at sexual abuse they suffered as a child knows how wicked and despicable people are the scum on Question Time, the judiciary and the police are for covering this up. What is clear is that our civilisation is being dragged down to the level of a Third World hell-hole of savages. Muslims have no place in Europe and must be deported. The authorities are terrified of us revolting and yet they are making it inevitable by their appeasement of the perpetrators of these Acts of War.