Sunday, 31 October 2010

Standing on the Firm Ground of Ancestral Precedent

The mainstream parties have bad images - treason, war crimes, corruption, sleaze but are part of the same elites as the media and hold the power. The corrupt MS politicians when exposed are so as individuals but in the case of un-orthodox parties individual cases of bad behaviour are generalised to dehumanise all the members.

People are losing their trust in mainstream parties but they see BNP not as a saviour but a threat even while the country is being Balkanised! The elites call it ethnic cleansing when the wrong side like Serbs do it but when they do it to us they call it progress and dehumanise protesters as “racists” and “haters”.

Of course the mainstream are going to oppose us and of course they are going to use their political power and influence on us but there is no need for the wider population to hate us. Our opposition to “race replacement”was the normal, natural way of thinking until Hitler made it look evil and barbaric and were seemingly unaware that we have a British tradition. Before Hitler the Conservative party was the national party and many Socialists were patriotic.

Is nationalism facing the same difficulty which as after Thatchers comments that people were afraid of being swamped in 1979? Do people believe the Tories will address their concerns? In the late '70s and 1980s support which might otherwise have gone to nationalists certainly went to the Conservatives in particular areas like Essex and East London.

It is different now. Immigration directly affects people in areas from Southern England to the north of Scotland in a way that it never did thirty years ago. An indirect effect of the new Tory government will be to galvanise a nationalist movement. The middle-aged and older, comfortably-off, disproportionately concentrated in the Home Counties may have to face reality now gypsies have preferential treatment over land in their areas and realise that a Tory-led government will also be biased against them whatever they say; radical imams are too threatening or taxes too high.

In recent years the Tory party abandoned nationalism to promote Globalism. Its traditional supporters are still marooned. There is not a single Conservative councillor in Newcastle, Sheffield, Liverpool or Manchester and the party is hardly any better off in many other places while the working classes or most people in Scotland and Northern England will never be reconciled with them. Where the Liberal Democrats have become the main opposition to Labour they are likely to suffer a fall in popularity due to their coalition with the Tories at national level. Yet no organisation is capable of countering a proper critique of globalisation when we begin to offer a proper one.

The Establishment isn't strong, it's weak, and hated by vast sections of the population, possibly a majority as we see from the turn out figures for General Elections, and the results; it has virtually no presence at street level, it's ideas are manifestly bankrupt and it has nearly destroyed our society, our economy and our culture. They only look good by comparison to the inadequates who have led radical nationalism.

There is much call for a properly run party and even in its present ineptly run state the BNP got over half a million in the GE. For years polls have showed opposition to mass immigration. There was a poll that showed people agreed with our policies but when they found out which party had the policies would not support it. On the doorstep people tell activists they do not trust the leaders and they will not vote for Nazis. This is because they party was not positioned as the new Nationalist Conservative party, socially and culturally Conservative, but not economically. We should be the successors to the "Nationalist Conservatives" and develop to deal with contemporary issues. There are hard financial times coming because of the MS parties profligacy and we need economic policies to deal with this reality and give our people priority not immigrants.

Please be aware - I am not talking about Civic nationalism, but proper nationalism only the traditional British sort not a foreign import. People from all walks of life have expressed concern at the dangers of trying to mix different types of people and the destruction of our identity. All have suffered and some have been openly persecuted. This is not a left versus right issue but common sense versus utopian idealism.

I have prepared an overview of honourable politicians and mainstream people like academics, actors, popular entertainers who have voiced fears for the future. It is long and people do not have to plough through it but use it is a resource for research and examples. It shows that the way of thinking the state is bullying us into is perverse and that the instinct to conserve our homogeneity is the natural way for for all peoples.

Edmund Burke defined a nation which involves a shared identity, history and ancestry, and continuity: “… it becomes a partnership not only between those who are living and those who are dead, but between those who are living and those who are dead, and those who are to be born.” A racial world view is a traditional world view and goes back to Anglo-Saxon-Celtic tribal days.
The Myth of Racial Equality.

Scottish Philosopher David Hume’s essay ‘Of National Character’.had an original 1753 footnote which read:
"I am apt to suspect the negroes and in general all the other species of men (for there are four or five different kinds) to be naturally inferior to the whites. There never was a civilized nation of any other complexion than white, nor even any individual eminent either in action or speculation."
Historical figures and leading intellectuals. Elizabeth.1 in 1601 had the “Blackamoors””voided from the realm.” Edward Gibbon, the great historian of the Collapse of Rome, warned of a time hence when minarets would sprout amongst the spires of Oxford. G.K.Chesterton predicted war with Muslims in England in his novel The Flying Inn (1912).

The myth of racial equality was also destroyed by Jewish Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli in Chapter 24 of “Lord George Bentinck: A Political Biography”(1852): “The Jews...are a living and the most striking evidence of the falsity of that pernicious doctrine of modern times, the natural equality of man. The particular equality of a particular race is a matter of municipal arrangement, and depends entirely on political considerations and circumstances; but the natural equality of man now in vogue, and taking the form of cosmopolitan fraternity, is a principle which, were it possible to act on it, would deteriorate the great races and destroy all the genius of the world. What would be the consequences on the great Anglo-Saxon republic, for example, were its citizens to secede from their sound principle of reserve, and mingle with their negro and coloured populations? In the course of time they would become so deteriorated that their states would probably be reconquered and regained by the aborigines whom they have expelled, and who would then be their superiors.”

Putting your own people first was It was the normal, natural view until Hitler.

Three-times British Prime Minister, Stanley Baldwin, on 24 May 1929, said: “…that each one of us, so far as in him lies, will strive to keep these islands a fit nursery for our race.”

Sir Winston Churchill wanted the Conservative party to adopt the slogan “Keep England White.” Harold Macmillan entered in his diary for January 20th 1955: "More discussion about the West Indian immigrants. A Bill is being drafted - but it's not an easy problem. P.M. thinks 'Keep England White' a good slogan! The bill was not ready till June 1955, two months after Churchill had stood down. This is recorded in MacMillan's, “At the End of the Day.”

Documents at the Public Records Office record the fifth Marquess of Salisbury: “... we are faced with a problem which, though at present it may be only a cloud the size of a man’s hand, may easily come to fill the whole political horizon …With each year that passes, and with the general improvement with methods of transportation, the flow increases. Indeed, if something is not done to check it now, I should not be at all surprised if the problem became quite unmanageable in twenty or thirty years time.” Letter to Viscount Swinton March 1954.

The records also show Oliver Lyttleton (later Lord Chandos) trying to bring common sense to bear on the matter. In a letter to Swinton 31/3/1954 wanting deposits of £500 to be put down by immigrants, “ if there is to be means of controlling the increasing flow of coloured people who come here largely to enjoy the benefits of the Welfare State.”He had a list of all restrictions imposed on Britons by other Commonwealth countries who refused to accept “persons who are likely to become a public charge,” illiterates”, those deemed “undesirable” had “unsuitable standards or habits of life” many had quota systems and even dictation tests. Jamaica prohibited those likely “to become a charge on public funds by reason of infirmity of body or mind or ill-health or who is not in possession of sufficient means to support himself or such of his dependants as he shall bring with him to the island”.Thirty–nine territories had entry permit systems or required prospective residents to first obtain permission. Britain alone allowed anyone in!

Enoch Powell refined his views in a speech to the Southall Chamber of Commerce on 4th November 1971, “Yet it is more truly when he looks into the eyes of Asia that the Englishman comes face to face with those who will dispute with him possession of his native land.”

Cyril Osborne Conservative(Louth) began his campaign against immigration in 1954. The open entry to anyone was not brought under any control until the Commonwealth Immigration bill (1961).At the second reading Osborne warned “that the world’s poor would swarm to Britain’s welfare honey pot. We have neither the room nor the resources to take all who would like to come.” We are seeing this now with boats leaving Africa for Europe. In March 1965 he told the House,”Our children and grandchildren will curse us for our moral cowardice.”

Norman Pannell (C) Liverpool,proposed a motion at the 1958 Tory conference for reciprocal rights of entry with other Commonwealth countries,. Only the U.K. let anyone in: “When I visited Nigeria two years ago as a Member of Parliament without ultimate responsibility for the affairs of that country, I was given an entry permit valid for 14 days and renewable subject to good behaviour.” He also addressed the 1961 conference and stated that Home Secretary Butler had agreed with his suggestion of deporting immigrants who commit crimes, but no action had been taken.

Harold Gurden(c) wrote to the Times of 13th December 1960: “On the health question we find the middle ring of the city (Birmingham), where immigrants are mainly concentrated, heavily peppered with dots of tuberculosis incidence.” In 2005 we were told that we now have a record number of TB cases and there are more in London than the usual breeding grounds of the disease abroad.

In The Unarmed Invasion (1965) Lord Elton wrote, “We seem to be re-enacting the story of the Roman Empire, which in its decadence imported subject races to do the menial tasks.” In his autobiography, rock guitarist Eric Clapton tells of adverts that he saw in Jamaica for immigrants to come here and it was clear that they were being brought here as cheap labour.

Peter Griffiths(c) Smethwick called for health checks on immigrants when he responded to a question in the local paper the “Smethwick Telephone”, “Immigration should be limited to those of sound health who have jobs and living accommodation arranged before they enter.” This was prescient as there was an outbreak of Typhoid in Smethwick in April 1965. In 1964 there had been uproar over the general election at Smethwick which Griffiths won against the trend on anti-immigration . A bomb was planted outside Griffith’s home on 26th October 1965 because of the way he had been de-humanised by press and politicians.

In the debate on the 1968 Race Relations Bill Ronald Bell (c)(later knighted) argued that the bill was “very deep and damaging encroachments into the proper sphere of persons decisions.” (Hansard, 23/3/1968). In a speech “This Sceptred Isle” to W.I.S.E. at the National Liberal Club in 1981. We are well on the road back to “presentment of Englishry”, when in the days after the Norman Conquest that it was a defence to show that the injured person was only an Englishman.”

In 1981 K.Harvey Proctor(c) announced the Conservative party Monday Club's official policy - to repatriate 50,000 immigrants a year. The forward to the document was by Sir Ronald Bell.

Tony Marlowe MP in Northampton told the Oxford University Conservative Association in 1981, “Hordes of exotic invaders have flooded the continent (Europe) wishing to help themselves to the luxuries of Western living. Nowhere has the pressure been greater than in the United Kingdom. No country has been less prepared to stem the flow than our own. In this land which proclaims free speech free discussion has been stifled by humbug and by the censorship of an establishment unwilling to contemplate the radical cures which alone can reverse the tide.” “What would be unacceptable and should not under any circumstances be tolerated is a policy of suppression and inaction for no policy can be more calculated to bring about the racial holocaust which we should all so earnestly strive to avoid.”

In 1993 the grandson of Sir Winston Churchill, also called Winston, warned that in the north of England half the population was now Muslim and If our prime minister(Major) believes that 50 years hence “spinsters will still be cycling to Communion on Sunday morning” he had best think again. Rather, "the muezzin will be calling Allah's faithful to the High Street mosque" for Friday prayers. The Times (London) attacked him for a 'tasteless outburst.'" Mr. Churchill was viscously shouted down on BBC Radio Four’s Today programme by presenter John Humphrey’s in what was a despicable attack on an elected politician.

John Townend(C) who wrote in 1991, that Government “ministers wanted to turn the British into a "mongrel" race and the Commission for Racial Equality should be abolished.” In 1989, he suggested deportation of Muslims who opposed Salman Rushdie's Satanic Verses, "England must be reconquered for the English".

Another of Sir Winston’s grandsons, Nicholas Soames commented in the Commons. On July 17th 2007 he said, “foreign immigration is now 25 times higher than it has ever been in the past, … The sharp increase in immigration is no accident. To suggest, as Ministers do, that it is all a result of the fall of communism or of globalisation is, frankly, bizarre. The numbers point clearly to a massive increase since the present Government came to power in 1997. Part of the increase is due to their failure during their first five years in office to get a grip on asylum claims, of which more than 60 per cent. were eventually judged to be unfounded. Another part is due to their decision to allow a massive increase in work permits, which have trebled since 1997. At the same time, their decision in June 1997 to abolish the primary purpose rule has led to the number of spouses admitted to Britain doubling from 20,000 to 40,000 a year.” He was accused hysterically of getting his information from the BNP!

In 2005 Lord Tebbit former chairman of the Conservative party told e-politix website , “Islam is so unreformed there have been no real advances in art, literature, science or technology in the Muslim world in 500 years, and multiculturalism was in danger of undermining UK society. In the 1980s he disputed the loyalty of immigrants who backed cricket teams from their countries of origin. He claimed if he had been heeded it might have stopped the London bombings. After which he declared that Enoch’s prophecies of racial civil war were right.

Labour politicians have also spoken out for their people.

Two days after the Empire Windrush docked on the 22 July 1948 with 790 west Indians, J.D.Murray and ten other Labour MP’s wrote to Labour Prime Minister Clement Atlee, asking for legislation to prevent an influx. Atlee replied, that he thought they would “make a genuine contribution to our labour difficulties at the present.” There had been racial battles in 1948 between 31 July and 2 August in Liverpool, in Deptford on the 18th July; and Birmingham between the 6th and 8th of August 1949 but the idealists ignored them as they had in 1919 when after the racial battles in Liverpool and Cardiff.

The first actual debate on immigration was in the House of Commons on the 5th of November 1954 in a thirty-minute adjournment debate called by John Hynd Labour M.P. for Sheffield (Attercliffe). “One day recently 700 embarked from Jamaica without any prospect of work, housing or anything else.” He also said the colour bar in Sheffield dance halls because of knife fights was justified. Both Hynd and another Labour M.P. James Johnson called for a committee of enquiry to be set up. Henry Hopkinson(c), Minister of State at the Colonial Office admitted that he had received many letters from worried M.P.’s on both sides.

In the Commons in December 1958 Labour’s Frank Tomney, remarked on elected representatives ignoring their constituents. “We have been sent here by the electorate to give expression to issues which concern them.” Fellow Notting Hill MP George Rogers (L) told the Daily Sketch of 2/9/58,” Overcrowding has fostered vice, drugs, prostitution and the use of knives.” James Harrison (L) from Nottingham also supported controls. Mr Tomney was a practical man of humble origins and understood his people, "I have come directly from the benches of a factory to the benches of the Commons". Tomney's defence of his young constituents in the House of Commons debate on the 1958 Notting Hill Race Battles, who were inaccurately represented by their lawyers, stitched up by the police and given excessive sentences by evil Judge Salmon. This was the most noble and heroic speech in the history of the House of Commons.

In May 1976 with an influx of Malawi Asians into his Bermondsey constituency, Bob. Mellish, then Labours’ chief whip, told the Commons, “With 53 million of us we cannot go on without strict immigration control.”

Prominent journalists.

Charles Moore, former editor of the Daily Telegraph, produced Salisbury Paper 9 in 1981,”The Old People of Lambeth”. It was an empirical research into the real living conditions of “whites” rather than another abstract academic study. One elderly man told him, “…its our Queen and our country, why should we be afraid to go out?”

Former Sunday Telegraph editor Sir Peregrine Worsthorne has written “even Hitler would not have treated ordinary people with such cruelty.”

In a book review for the Salisbury Review of Spring 2003 Sir Alfred Sherman, former senior advisor to Mrs Thatcher and leader writer on the Jewish Chronicle, recalled a friend in race relations had asked him to take a look at the reception areas of Deptford and Southall in the mid 60’s, “ I was horrified. My natural vague sympathies for the immigrants, strangers in a foreign land, was replaced by strong but hopeless sympathy for the British victims of mass immigration, whose home areas were being occupied. I was made aware of a disquieting evolution in “Establishment” attitudes towards what they called immigration or race relations and I dubbed “colonialisation.” The well-being and rights of immigrants and ethnic minorities had become paramount. The British working classes, hitherto the object of demonstrative solicitude by particularly the New Establishment on the left, but the working classes had acquired new status as the enemy, damned by the all-purpose pejorative “racists.”
Eminent legal minds.

Viscount Radcliffe, former Lord of Appeal in Ordinary was concerned about the preferential treatment being accorded to immigrants above that given to the natives, “ I cannot for myself, imagine how juridical notions can be founded on such vague conceptions. The conduct of human life consists of choices, and it is a very large undertaking indeed to outlaw some particular grounds of choice, unless you can confine yourself to such blatant combinations of circumstances as are unlikely to have any typical embodiment in this country. I try to distinguish in my mind between an act of discrimination and an act of preference, and each time the attempt breaks down.”(Immigration and Settlement: some general considerations”.(Race, vol.11, no.1, pp 35-51.) Incidentally, it was Radcliffe who coined the term often attributed to Enoch: “The alien wedge.”

In a case against squatters, Judge Harold Brown commented,” It seems curious that if a landlord closes the door on a coloured applicant merely because of his colour he might well get into serious trouble. But if he closes his door on white people with children merely because they have children, he is under no penalty at all.” (Guardian, 2 August 1969.)

In 1982 Lord Denning, widely regarded as the twentieth century’s greatest judge, published “What Next In The Law”: "The English longer share the same standards of conduct. Some of them come from countries where bribery and graft are accepted as an integral part of life: and where stealing is a virtue so long as you are not found out."

In 1995 retired judge, James Pickles, told a literary luncheon in Leeds, "Black and Asian people are like a spreading cancer... There are no-go areas in Halifax, where I have lived all my life, where white people dare not go even with their cars... All immigration must stop... The country is full up. We don't want people like that here. They have a different attitude to life. They are not wanting to adopt our ways of life" (India Mail 02.03.95).Liaqat Hussain of the Bradford Council for Mosques called for Judge Pickles to be prosecuted under the Race Relations Act.
There have also been scholars.

Dr. John Casey who read a paper to the Conservative Philosophy Group which was also printed in the first issue of The Salisbury Review in Autumn 1982. “There is no way of understanding British and English history that does not take seriously the sentiments of patriotism that go with a continuity of institutions, shared experience, language, customs, kinship. There is no way of understanding English patriotism that averts its eyes from the fact that it has at its centre a feeling for persons of ones own kind.” Dr.Casey was persecuted. Marxist professor Terry Eagleton held rival English lectures, campus rent-a-mobs demonstrated and refused to attend his lectures and the Sunday Times of 1st December 1991 printed a photograph that made him look like a wizened crow!

Professor Bob Rowbotham in the London Sunday Telegraph of 2 July 2006, referred to the motives of the elites, who were creating what Marx called “A reserve army of labour.”
The transformation of Southall was brought about by Wolf’s rubber factory encouraging workers from India.

The Socialist intellectual David Goodhart in Prospects (March 1998), quoted Conservative M.P. David Willetts on the Welfare State: "The basis on which you can extract large sums of money in tax and pay it out in benefits is that most people think the recipients are people like themselves, facing difficulties which they themselves could face. If values become more diverse, if lifestyles become more differentiated, then it becomes more difficult to sustain the legitimacy of a universal risk-pooling welfare state. People ask, 'Why should I pay for them when they are doing things I wouldn't do? … Progressives want diversity but they thereby undermine part of the moral consensus on which a large welfare state rests... The traditional conservative Burkean view is that our affinities ripple out from our families and localities, to the nation and not very far beyond. That view is pitted against a liberal universalist one which sees us in some sense equally obligated to all human beings from Bolton to Burundi … .”

Economist Professor Ezra Mishan exposed immigration as being about cheap labour in the Salibury Review in 1988: “Frequent claims that the new immigrants have in fact reduced the labour shortage in particular sectors of the economy – in particular, the apparent shortages of labour in transport, in nursing, and in what are popularly to be the more menial and less attractive occupations- are na├»ve. Managers of public services in Britain who, along with some private firms, sent agents to the West Indies in the 1950’s in order to recruit labour were only acting as good capitalists would in such circumstances – attracting lower-paid labour from outside their area in order to prevent wages from rising within it. If it was not for that wages would have risen.”

Mervyn King, the governor of the Bank of England, complained to a committee of MPs that it was hard to manage the economy when nobody knew how many people were in the country. .. Less privileged folk of his generation, for whose fears about the future he clearly has a patrician contempt, will pay a heavy price if our unprecedented experiment of mass immigration goes wrong.”

Popular entertainers
Morrisey complained that immigration had led to the loss of our identity in November 2007: “ British identity has disappeared because the country has been “flooded” by immigrants. He suggested to music magazine NME that immigration was one of the reasons he would not move back to Britain from America .

Dame Shirley Bassey was quoted on The Voice of Reason blog as saying: “It's sad that they just let it (Britain) go to rack and ruin, Labour. How? Well, it's violent, isn't it? That's all we read in the papers and see on television”. Why does she think this has happened? "We're letting in too many people. We're an island, for God's sake. And the Britishness seems to have gawwwnnne."
Television and film personalities.

The veteran Liberal broadcaster Ludovic Kennedy wrote in a book review for “The Oldie”, in January 2004, that there ”are too many black faces on TV, political correctness has got completely out of hand.” Sir Patrick Moore, the world renowned astronomer to remark “The more asylum seekers get the less there is for us.”

Early in 2005, Welsh film star John Rhys-Davies who played Gimli in Lord of the Rings told “World magazine ”the Muslim birthrate is a demographic catastrophe, I think that Tolkein says that some generations will be challenged. And if they do not rise to meet that challenge, they will lose their civilisation.” Film star John Hurt praised Enoch: “I think he was just saying: We can’t afford to have any more.”

The Sunday Times(London) June 11, 2006 reported that Rear Admiral Chris Parry, one of Britain’s most senior military strategists has warned that western civilisation faces a threat on a par with the barbarian invasions that destroyed the Roman empire. He said future migrations would be comparable to the Goths and Vandals while north African “Barbary” pirates could be attacking yachts and beaches in the Mediterranean within 10 years. Europe, including Britain, could be undermined by large immigrant groups with little allegiance to their host countries—a “reverse colonisation” as Parry described it. These groups would stay connected to their homelands by the internet and cheap flight. … “Globalisation makes assimilation seem redundant and old-fashioned … the process acts as a sort of reverse colonisation, where groups of people are self-contained, going back and forth between their countries, exploiting sophisticated networks and using instant communication on phones and the internet.”

The selfish middle classes wanting cheap labour and low restaurant bills are blighting their own children's prospects. Frank Field (L) told the panel on the Moral Maze In August 2006: “The sheer numbers and the attempt to close down the issue. He took the side of the poor natives and talked about this influx pushing down wages and people having to compete for homes. He commented that the panel are well-heeled and the ones who are getting cheap labour.

Former MP George Walden (C ) told of how we are being replaced. Writing in the Times of 5th November 2006 Walden noted that the Office for National Statistics (ONS) had announced some startling new figures: Britain was taking in 1,500 immigrants a day, while 1,000 Brits left.”

In Time to Emigrate(Gibson square Books). Walden was writing advice to his son, who'd just said that he and his wife were thinking of emigrating. Their young son had been viciously beaten by a thug just yards from their front door. As the boy emerged from his coma, his thankful parents started to wonder just how safe their "safe" part of North London truly was.

The book is criticism of immigration, not the immigrants themselves but the long term effect immigration is having on our people. It's not the immigrants he objects to bur the elites who are letting them in in such enormous numbers.

We have a moral duty to ensure that our children and descendents receive their inheritance that was passed down from our ancestors not distribute it amongst immigrants and the rest of the world. The natural society is organic and evolves naturally among people who belong together. The living honour the dead by passing on what they have inherited to their children, but now we are perversely having our inheritance dissipated by the elites and shared with outsiders and the homes and jobs our children should have are taken by the people brought in as cheap labour.
 Mister Fox

The EU – the Consequences of Creating Eurabia

The media is torn between their duty of informing the public and their wanting to keep sensitive information quiet, however, information does come out in bits and we can piece it together to build up a picture of what is really going on. This is reminiscent of the media cover ups of the rise of Hitler in what was a previous policy of appeasement. We also have warnings that we should heed from highly respected people. We were warned by Vladimir Bukovsky, former Soviet dissident who spent twelve years in psychiatric units, published of secret documents from the Kremlin and must start to take notice. He has warned that the EU is a new dictatorial Soviet Union is of great importance. (1)
What I say to people is neither believe the media nor take my word for it. Check for yourselves — there is much information on the Internet. People can not defend against something if they do not know it is happening.

What is really happening?

The Authorities through Europe have changed sides and are surrendering the continent to islam from a mixture of motives from cowardice, emasculation and hate for the people and traditions. The practical effects are alarming!
Throughout Europe there is a battle for possession of the Continent. This is against European people and also Jewish communities. There are almost continuous riots in France and vicious attacks on white and Jewish people which the media tries to hide
In Malmo, Sweden young white women are hunted down and raped by Muslims and it is no longer for Jewish people to go out in identifying clothes, but the authorities try to suppress knowledge of this. The Daily Express(London) of 26 February 2009 reported that “British Muslims” were acting as snipers and bomb-makers killing our troops in Afghanistan. Army eavesdropping operations have heard British accents among Taliban forces.

In Luton, England, the Muslims Against Crusades group protested against the parade of local regiment The Royal Anglians, or “The Poachers”, on their return from Iraq calling them “murderers”! English people ptotested but the police protected the Muslims.(2)

During the Muslim-Socialist protests against Israel’s raids on Gaza of January 2009, protesters throughout Europe and in London openly chanted “Jews to the gas” while the police looked on.
Cherie Blair's half sister Lauren incited Muslims against Jewish people in Blackburn in a “Free Gazza” demo in January 2009 and the police covered it up. (3)
At a demonstration in Tower Hamlets in the East End of London on 27 June 2010 Demagogic politician George Galloway threatened violence. He warned of 10,000 dead bodies.
To prevent Geert Wilders speaking at the House of Lords, Muslim peer Lord Ahmed threatened to bring 10,000 Muslim protesters outside the Lords. The figure 10,000 is highly significant in the Koran. The army of the Muslims that conquered Mecca without any blood shed were 10,000 men as we are told inthe book of "Muhammad the Prophet" by Maulana Muhammad Ali, pages 128-129). 
Incidentally, Galloway's publishing operation, Asian Voice was funded by the Pakistani government by £600,000 pounds? (3)

The elites submitted to Saudi when they abandoned the bribery investigation into the arms deal between Saudi Arabia and BAE systems because of an explicit threat made by the Saudi authorities. Britain’s former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles, explained that if the case continued, “British lives on British streets” would be at risk.

What is behind the surrender? Well, decadence and, of course, oil and money!
Gordon Brown and Lord Mandelson visited Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states in November 2008. They asked for billions to be put into the International Monetary Fund and, as Mandelson later admitted, offered Saudis some influence over Britain and the West. The Saudi regime is the motor behind the Islamisation of the West as their Wahhabi form of Islam is making Islam dominant in the world by spreading Wahhabi mosques, preachers and educational institutions to promote holy war and convert thousands of British Muslims.

Barclays Bank has had almost £6 billion invested from Abu Dhabi and Qatar. Brown is to make London the global centre of Islamic banking and Britain’s major banks are accepting Sharia finance. Sharia is a project for Islamicising society. Alistair Darling, Chancellor of the Exchequer, advocates Sharia finance.

Islamist ideas are spread through Islamic study centres attached to our universities. Professor Anthony Glees revealed that eight universities — including Oxford and Cambridge — have received over £233.5 million from Saudi sources since 1995.

The EU uses social engineering techniques they studied in Russia in 2005 when the Audio Visual Observatory of the European Council held a symposium in Moscow.

Benita Ferrero Waldner, European Commissioner for External Relations and European Neighborhood Policy, in her speech entitled “Intercultural dialogue: the media’s role”, told selected media representatives from across Europe: “Freedom of expression is central to the values and traditions of Europe. But its preservation depends on responsible behaviours by individuals. By extension, we do not believe the media should be regulated from outside, but rather that you find ways to regulate yourselves.

“In considering the question of self-regulation, I would also ask you to think about the need for monitoring from within your own professional bodies. I am convinced that will have a significant impact… We will identify a nucleus of journalists and analysts around which to develop a structured, sustainable system of information exchange and publication focused on North–South understanding.”

She said, “Europeans know from bitter experience the gravity of the threat racism and xenophobia represent. Indeed, the European Union was born out of the cataclysm of intolerance that engulfed twentieth-century Europe. Our task has been … minimising hatred and maximising reason. And today the European Union stands as a testimony to Europe’s religious, linguistic and cultural diversity. We are a community of values, united by our diversity and our determination to prevent such a threat from overwhelming us again.
… That is why we have set up the Monitoring Centre and why we are continually fighting for equality and tolerance.”

The destruction of Western Europe is taking place through mass immigration and the imposition of totalitarian laws and bureaucratic Human Rights Commissions to oppress dissident patriots. Only a small minority of the Muslim community is involved in street fighting, but the entire community wishes to see Islamic ways dominate the capital cities of Europe.

The World Culture Forum Alliance, founded by the Ford Foundation, is linked to the US Council on Foreign Relations and the CIA, as well as the EU, the European Council and UNESCO. They have admitted they are using propaganda and withholding certain news to manage and control us.

The Anna Lindh Foundation was founded by the Arab League, the EU, the European Council and UNESCO. Traugott Schoefthaler, head of the Anna Lindh Foundation, said: “We will arrange giant Muslim Youth Festivals — like the ‘Images of the Middle East’, which lasted six weeks in 2006 in Denmark.

“We will tackle stereotypes and prejudices and ignorance and change the daily ‘news journalism’ to portray every-day life of ordinary people, which can create identification and fascination — and intercultural understanding. We will tackle our stereotypic images of people from foreign cultures and make new experiments with pictures in public places, in the media and advertising.
“And we will have common projects with people from other cultures. We will develop the intercultural skills of journalists, school pupils and artists and exchange people from these groups with (Muslim) colleagues. We will manage art and cultural productions. We will train the school teachers and influence their education to be multicultural.

“And we will influence the curricula of the schools to become multicultural by means of revision of existing textbooks and educational materials.”

In 1995, EU leaders made a contract, known as the Barcelona Agreement, with the leaders of the countries surrounding the Mediterranean. Its purpose is to ensure mass immigration from North Africa into the EU that will destroy our civilisations in Western Europe. This has been kept from the people even though it will become effective in 2010. Some excerpts will show what we are not being told. This has now blossemed into The European-mediterranean Agreement.
The EU intends to force its subject peoples to respect Islam which means persecuting any who oppose EU sponsored invasion. We are to obey the dictates of multiculturalism to promote tolerance between different ethnic groups in Europe. This targets Europeans, while other groups are allowed their own separate development. There is to be a one-sided campaign against ‘racism’, ‘xenophobia’ and ‘intolerance’. It is meant to be applicable to whites but not other ethnic groups.

There is to be more Muslim influence on radio, television, newspapers and magazines. A youth exchange programme is to bring about cooperation between future Euro-Mediterranean generations as stipulated in the Barcelona Declaration adopted at the Euro-Mediterranean Conference.

Our respective European religions and cultures are devalued ready for the implementation of Islamic mores. The populations of the nine Muslim countries will be given free movement of goods, services, capital and people into Europe in return for political and economic changes. Association agreements have been made with all partner countries except Syria (Euro-Mediterranean Foreign Minister Conference in Naples held on 2–3.12.2003). Negotiations for Turkish EU entrance began in 2005. When the 75 million Turks join Jewish people will be openly attacked in the streets and the EU police will not be able to control it.

Less than a month after 9/11 the EU rulers again surrendered to Islam: “The ministers declined as both dangerous and unfounded any connection between terror and the Arab and Muslim world. In this context the importance of the Barcelona Process was emphasised by everybody as a suitable and recognised instrument to promote a dialogue between equal partners and civilisations. The ministers agreed to work on deepening the ongoing dialogue between the cultures and civilisations, especially wanting to direct attention towards youth, education, and the media.”

Also read the speech by the head of the “Danish Centre for Culture and Development” (CKD) — run by the Danish Foreign Ministry — Olaf Gerlach Hansen, in Rabat, Morocco, 13 June 2005.

The European Union and the European Council plan to destroy our identity: “Cultural policy must avoid the popular distinction between ‘them’ and ‘us’, even mentioning ‘the other’ , as this opens the gate for imposing collective identity on the individual.” Yet they impose the collective identity “European” on all the diverse nations of Europe!

The EU has made cooperation agreements with the Islamic Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, which aims — according to article 5a of its charter — to spread Muslim ways of thinking and living in the entire world (Charter of the Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization— ISESCO).

Our politicians pretend that we and Islam have shared goals. Margaret Beckett, when British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, told Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten on the 7July 2006: “Our obligation to the values that mean most to us — freedom, tolerance and justice — has grown even stronger and deeper since the London bombs. So has our relationship with the Islamic world, which also shares our common ideals, today.”

The UN is no longer what it was set up to be. The Durban conference of 2005 lifted the veil on reality. The Conference against Racism was meant to pillory whites for crimes of slavery and colonialism but became a fest of anti- Jewishness from Muslim countries.
Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga admitted in the Italian paper Corriere della Sera in 2008, that in the 1970s, the Italian government allowed Arab terrorist groups freedom of movement in the country in exchange for immunity from attacks.

The government of Prime Minister Aldo Moro reached a “secret non-belligerence pact between the Italian state and Palestinian resistance organisations, including terrorist groups. Moro designed the terms of the agreement with Arab terrorists, Cossiga said. “The terms of the agreement were that the Palestinian organisations could even maintain armed bases of operation in the country, and they had freedom of entry and exit without being subject to normal police controls, because they were ‘handled’ by the secret services.”

The security services have operated a similar deal in Britain. On 22 August 1998, the newspaper Al Sharq Al Awsat quoted Omar Bakri: “I work here in accordance with the covenant of peace which I made with the British government when I got (political) asylum.”

This covenant allowed Muslim extremists to plan attacks abroad and develop terror networks here. In 1999 it was reported that each year approximately 2,000 Muslims were trained about Holy War at camps in Britain run by Bakri’s organisation al-Muhajiroun.

In Birmingham and London trainees were instructed in hand-to-hand combat and survival skills. They were sent for further military training in Yemen and Afghanistan. After the London bombings, The Times reported that “a dozen members” of Al-Muhajiroun “have taken part in suicide bombings or have become close to Al-Qaeda and its support network.” He was protected here for 20 years.

In January 2007 Bakri revealed that Islamist extremists were infiltrating the police and other public sector organisations. The Daily Mail exposed eight members of al-Qaeda in the police.
MI5 investigate what the Government instructs them to investigate and ignore what the Government wants them to ignore.

As far back as 4 May 2003, The Sunday Telegraph’s Alasdair Palmer wrote: “Britain has become the headquarters of choice for extremist Islamic preachers, who now have a network of organisations dedicated to sowing pure hatred: hatred of the West, of democracy, and of the values of tolerance and freedom — the very values that give them the freedom to operate here: ‘Your task against the infidel,’ says one video, ‘is to kill their children, take their women, destroy their homes.’”

From 11 September 2001 to the end of March 2008, British authorities arrested 1,471 Muslims for terrorism-related offences. Yet just six months later, The Daily Mail reported the security services were scaling down checks on Muslim terrorists.
In January 2009, the head of domestic security service MI5 revealed that 2,000 people in Britain were involved with Islamist terrorist plots and many more support terrorism through fundraising and propaganda.

Commander Shaun Sawyer of Scotland Yard’s counterterrorism command gave the okay to Muslim extremists when he told the Muslim Safety Forum that security services would investigate “far right” groups who could be planning a terrorist “spectacular” to stoke up racial tensions,” he said.
This focus on “far-right” followed an order to the police to “go easy” on Muslim terrorists.

The London bombings of 9/5 resulted from British security services allowing the development of terror networks throughout Britain. A threat assessment by the Joint Terrorist Analysis Centre a mere month earlier stated: “There was no group with current intent and capability” to commit a terrorist attack in Britain.

Colin Cramphorne, chief constable of West Yorkshire from 2002 until his death in 2006, was mocked for warning that extremist cells ran training camps in national parks, such as the Yorkshire Dales.
It was known that Abu Qatada was running the al Qaeda cells in Spain and Germany from London. The two terrorists who bombed Mike’s Place in Tel Aviv were Muslims with British passports.

Not long after 9/11, the Prime Minister’s office published an analysis of terrorism that showed there was evidence available: “Al Qaeda retains the capability and the will to make further attacks on the US and its allies including the United Kingdom… other cells like those who carried out the tasks must be assumed to exist … al Qaeda functions on its own and through a network of other terrorist organisations. These include Egyptian Islamic Jihad and other North African Islamic extremist terrorist groups, and a number of other Jihadi groups in other countries including the Sudan, the Yemen, Somalia, Pakistan and India. Al Qaeda also maintains cells and personnel in a number of other countries.”

On its website, the Egyptian State Information Service announced in its article “Call to Combat Terrorism,” that Britain harboured seven of the 14 most wanted terrorists. These included one who plotted the failed assassination of the Egyptian prime minister.

In August 2006, the US government put the highest terrorism alert ever for commercial flights from Britain to US after “the liquid terror” attack was foiled.

Michael Chertoff, Homeland Securities Secretary, said that this “plot may indeed be suggestive of Al-Qaeda, but its real incubator is the atmosphere of Londonistan: the political correctness of Britain that keeps British officials from confronting the jihad ideology that spreads in British mosques and Islamic schools.”

A Muslim school in London taught pupils that Christian and Jewish people are “pigs. This is what the EU is importing into Europe.
We are faced with a new beginning and must seize the opportunity. This means leaving the Holocaust Denial era of the party behind and, by examining what is going on around us, as in this article, start discussions with Jewish communities for our mutual defence against this EU-Muslim attack on our two peoples. The BNP have a couple of hundred Jewish members so there are possibilities. I don't think either of us will survive in Europe the way things are going and with 75 million Turks joining the EU authorities will not be able to control Muslim extremists which is why we must organise mutual defence as I have shown.


An Odyssey into Reality From Received Ideology

In the Odyssey of Homer, the hero Odysseus wandered for ten years as he struggled to return to his family from the war with Troy. Homer is one of the greatest Dead White Males, a fount of our literature, which held ideas for subjects, quotations and a form of literature for succeeding writers for centuries too come. It was a spring to the greatest literary tradition in human history, English Literature, that is now a drying river. It was a blending of myths and legends organised into the form of a lofty Epic - the story of a hero. In his novel “Rassellas” Dr. Johnson's hero went on an adventure from the Happy Valley into the real world to make “the choice of life”. We are not offered ”a choice of life”: our lives are circumscribed by totalitarian elites.
There are personal Odysseys' when young people go out into the world or complete their rites of passage. They learn about life - they learn how people treat one another, how bad they can be and this gives them a gravitas and a serious appreciation of life.
A variant of this an odyssey from the enclosed world of received opinions created by the ruling elite, to the separate reality of what is really happening in the country. One of the first things we learn is that it is not only “Whites” who are racist. We are supposed to think that it is, and that we are the cause of the failure of the Multi-Racial dream to materialise because we are essentially evil (racist). We realise that other ethnic groups are racist towards us and have hatreds of other ethnic groups. The animosity between Muslims and Sikhs is very fierce indeed. Asylum seekers have fought gun battles in quiet formerly Ashford, Kent. The world we go into is not as we were told it is.

The re-education of Germany after the war by America was headed by Frankfurt School guru Theodor Adorno , with such as philosopher John Dewey and Major-General Robert McClure. Similar methods have since been used to re-educate Europe and the Anglosphere.(1) The new ideology was formed by followers of Freud and Marx and set the standard whereby dissidents were classed as Nazis or Fascists(later racists), the negative part of the dominant multi-racial ideology; it is the yardstick for everything to be avoided like sinning in religion; and the pathologising of the recalcitrant as having mental problems(prejudice) rather than a different point of view.

In this looking glass world we are the innocent victims of a fanatic Ideology called Multi-Racialism. This is the inverse of Nazism with we “whites” as the scapegoat group replacing Jews or the Bourgeoisie. Instead of the thousand year Reich of the Master Race, they are aiming for a Multi-Racial utopia of coffee-coloured persons. The groups Hitler hated, homosexuals, Gypsies and other racial groups are now privileged and almost sacred. Jews were almost deified for a time, but are falling from fashion. We are untermenschs and the inverse lebensraum is the importation of immigrants to replace us.
Public workers are trained to perceive reality in the way approved by the elites. Local councils send employees on a Soviet-style training to teach them they are uniquely racist - Racial Awareness Training, or RAT. If you convince another that they are always wrong then even when you yourself are wrong it looks as if you are right! It is how our negative self-image has been brainwashed into our consciousness. Well, stop! Think! That is dehumanisation. Just sit back and ponder this: You, gentle reader, are being de-humanised to make you feel guilty for things you have not done and to prepare you for dispossession. It is to demoralise you, to sap your spirit, so that you move out of your community without a protest.
As a little vignette of modern evil - RAT. The basis of this was a book by one Judith Katz which stated that racism is inherent only in whites. All other ethnic groups are pure and untainted by sin. The Whites are labelled racist and in a perverse racial persecution are reviled and abused in a sadistic ritual to drive out their racism and to punish them for imagined sins. In these sessions on video, a white blonde-haired woman would be verbally abused until she wept. Is that to promote racial harmony? No: it is a racist attack on us Whites. It is the masochistic confessional that police officers do. For years Teacher Training colleges have imparted the racist slur that only those with power can be racists. The idea is to stigmatise only Whites but stop! Throughout the Western world people of Jewish origin hold much power – the banks, Hollywood, Western media, so the Neo-Marxists are inculcating anti-Semitism in the masses!

Many Multi-Racial myths propagandised as truth melt into air when tested against reality. It is said that Muslims have a superior morality. In Balsall Heath, Birmingham there was a famous street named Cheddar Road. For years it had been a red-light area until the Muslims drove the tarts out. They were driven out by intimidation and harassment not harmonious race- relations. The last one to go was jeered and abused by children and repeatedly had fireworks pushed through her letterbox.
It is a process of ethnic cleansing to make territory suitable for their women and children. Vigilante groups drive round surrounding areas in widening circles harassing women whom they take to be tarts and street drinkers to drive them out. They make places safe for their own wives and children but to them we are “other” and they have no moral sense towards us. They repeatedly capture our young girls in bonds of drink and drugs and gang-rape them. (2)
I remember a simple, unworldly middle-class woman from Oxford Road, Moseley pontificating on how nice to see young Muslim men and White women in Cannon Hill Park “coming together”. Well, they were certainly doing that! She still trusts the elites and thinks they are looking after our interests. What the bourgoise gull did not know was that the White girls get gang-banged until the time comes for the young men to enter into arranged marriages, then they are dropped. This is what young British women have been delivered into by the evil elites; is this all our young women are worth?

The Soviets used to direct labour: our elites direct immigrants into our communities. Like the Soviets they live in special areas themselves, Mrs.Thatcher and John Major for example, live in gated communities, low hypocrites like TV interviewer Jeremy Paxman, beautiful rural villages where they employ immigrants as cheap labour!. (3) This is why he is so aggressive with interviewees he smugly labels racist – his own self-interest.
Hoist by their own petard: Pakistan was the source of hard drugs for years and now many young Muslims have fallen prey to heroine and crack cocaine. I can imagine people being surprised at this revelation, which clashes so mightily with the received prejudices. To those unworldly doubters I say: “Go round the hostels and the Narcotics Anonymous meetings in the inner cities and look!

Here is a practical example of how totalitarianism works. When I wrote “men” I froze momentarily, as I realised that describing them as “men” is no longer permitted. I should have said “persons”. The reason why I chose and used the word “men” was because in my experience the Asians who are addicted to heroine and crack cocaine have all been young men and to say “person” would be to implicate women in something that I have no evidence for and that would be unjust.

We are politically programmed by received ideology not experience. Ideology is a system of abstract ideas aimed towards a future system of perfection that we call Utopias. There is no learning just surrendering to the orthodox views of the time. It is a type of arrested mental development. It is a secular religion and needs an enemy in opposition like religion needs a evil; Whites are the enemy to the ideology of multi-racialism and used as culprits and scapegoats.
Near Craven Arms in Shropshire there is a folly that is (or was) owned by the Film actress Julie Christy. There is always something quaint and humorous about these idiosyncratic buildings. The locals tell of how the owner built it to see his ships returning through the Bristol Channel in the far distance! This folly is well named. It is also innocent.
But if one goes to the hideously desecrated Dover beach one will see folly that is most certainly not innocent! This is the Channel Tunnel, or Mrs. Thatcher’s Folly. Its mouth, like a satanic gargoyle, spews forth those who are coming to take our homes, Communities and destroy our environment. A historical precedent: In 409 A.D. As Rome was overrun St. Jerome wrote some moving lines:” I shall now say a few words of our present miseries…savage tribes in countless numbers have overrun all parts…The once noble city of Mainz has been captured and destroyed. In its Church many thousands have been massacred.” (Epistle 125)
When I was young, I did an a-level in Sociology and we were trained in the Levi-Strauss folly that we are just another culture like primitive tribes somewhere up the Amazon. I suggest that that comparing us with undeveloped tribes is inaccurate. For a nation that is declining from being a world empire the realistic comparison is with previous great empires, which also collapsed. The most obvious is the fall of Rome, but there many others, the Greeks; Egyptians, Hittites; Babylonians; Sumerians. Like us Rome rose from a smaller core area, hit a peak then went into decline. It is idle to look for exact recurrence in history but there is a similarity of symptoms. In the 345AD Barbarians were pouring over the Danube and into Rome as they are now coming out of Mrs. Thatcher’s Folly.

David Shayler the former MI5 spy revealed that in the 1990’s MI5 allowed thousands of members of al-Queda into this country despite repeated warnings from the French secret services and that many of these can no longer be removed because they have been given British citizenship! There are laws of Islamaphobia. At the same time we are told that terrorist attacks on us by Muslim extremists are inevitable. So now you know. Sit and wait to be blown up but if you are rude about the terrorists the British police will arrest you! (4)
It is a combination of Politically Correct ideology and emasculation in our rulers. Those who negotiate the world by common sense can not understand why Taliban fighters who fought against our soldiers are given asylum or why we are sued by people shot by our forces in the theatre of war.

I wish here to sound a warning to Jewish people: like black racist attacks on whites, which are kept secret, another hidden reality is racial attacks on Jewish people by Muslims.
When William Hague was leader of the Conservative party, he was to attend a function with the Jewish Board of Deputies. Some refused to attend because of his outspoken attacks on asylum seekers. I assume that his words raised the awful spectre of the gas chambers, but wait! This looking back to the past for the danger is not to face the future. Do Brits want to harm the Jewish community? Throughout Europe Jews are being persecuted by the Muslims their leaders helped import.

Why should we want to imitate Hitler, a foreign failure? Churchill tried to have a Bill introduced to control immigration in 1955. He had to stand down because of ill health – one of the greatest tragedies in modern history because his successor Anthony Eden shelved it. I wonder if the elites (which includes many of Jewish origin) will admit responsibility for the creation of a potential holocaust against Jewish people by Muslin fanatics here on British soil? All across the country “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” is on sale in Muslim shops!

It is customary for the promoters of decadence to attribute evil intentions to us, to allege that we are actively going about the world seeking to harm those who are different from ourselves. But the Multi-Racial totalitarianism was imposed on us and is having us driven out of our communities. The East End of London, famous for cockneys is almost entirely ethnically cleansed. It is mind-expanding to realise that the elites are what thy accuse us of: They are Racists and White supremacists in the back of their minds but because they have to deny this it is projected on to us. Which see: they assume that the immigrants want to be like us which shows White Supremacy. They deny the reality of changes made to our lives which are harmful to us: the scam of crashing cars, honour killings, forced marriages and producing idiots by first cousins marrying. Rather than proscribe such vile, savage practices the elites force us to accept this.
In the innocent days of the fifties these developments were unforeseeable but more uncivilised consequences of multi-racialism will occur. We need to be armed against these evils and had we kept the defence of our traditional prejudices none of this would have come to pass.

We are tarred with the brush of harbouring evil in our hearts against the incomers but it is reactive not innate. We did not ask for this. I am part of a reaction to try and save our people and communities from an unwarranted attack and if I were not morally obliged to do my duty, I would have stayed behind my plough! The whole Multi-Racial idea was forced on us by deceitful Governments who convinced us that we were in a democracy and as our elected representatives they were acting in our interests. We are living through a great historical phenomenon for it falls to few to live through the destruction of their civilisation in what is one of the most evil attacks on innocent, ordinary, people by their own rulers in the history of the human race.

    (1) Paul Gottfried. The Strange Death of Marxism.(2005); Tomislav Sunic. Homo Americanus: Child of the PostModern Age(2007). There are many books on this often from the victors point of view and often in German.

Immigration or Invasion?

The Mass immigration of aliens since 1948 is justified by deceitful arguments that they bring economic benefits. But only for the elites – the rest are pushed out of employment and their communities, their children disinherited. It is advanced behind utopian ideals and unrealistic plans for a one-world of one people but in practice, Global capitalists are importing cheap labour.
Free trade has been promoted as a pancea since Richard Cobden's speech of 1846 as:“drawing men together, thrusting aside the antagonism of race”, and creed, and language, and uniting us in the bonds of eternal peace”. In practice it is a policy that allows completely open economic borders, whereby cheap foreign goods can flood into the country unchallenged and undercut the wages of our own people and decimate the economic livelihood of the nation.
Of course there will be those that profit from cheap labour, cheap imports and the peddling of third world goods on an open market. This country is governed for business interests not the nation as a whole and they defend their interests against critics with the Trotskyite term"racist"!

We get alarm stories of how the government has lost control of its borders but what is happening is what they want to happen. Opponents speak of it as an invasion or colonisation. But which is it?

The replacement of a people is not painless but causes great misery and suffering and people who inflict misery and suffering on innocent people are evil and the distinction between an invasion or immigration, depends three factors: the strength or treason of the ruling elite plus numbers of the incomers and how they behave towards the hosts when they are in. These are present in most of my example.

A precedent from history is the internal conquest of Rome in 376AD by Goths after weakEmporer Valens had allowed them to settle. This is how demography works: if there had not been so many with strength from numbers they would not have rebelled

The Goths had been displaced by Huns and asked the Romans for asylum. The Romans allowed them in and when they were provoked by offensive Roman officials, revolted. Roman historian Ammianus explained the folly: “The affair caused more joy than fear and educated flatterers immoderately praised the good fortune of the Prince, which unexpectedly brought him so many young recruits from the ends of the earth...

Pat Buchanan gives pertinent examples in Death of the West. When Mexico got independence in 1821 when it had got independence and invited Americans to settle in Texas, its northern province. They applied two conditions: the Americans must swear allegiance to Mexico and convert to Catholicism, like our facile citizenship tests. But when the Americans were a sizable majority of ten to one they begun to think about independence as European Muslims are. The catalyst came under tyrant General Santa Anna - the Americans rebelled and took that part of Mexico for America. Now Mexicans are pouring into America and taking it back! (1)

Bishop Ali Nazir has exposed how Muslims take over areas of our country and keep us out. (2)
The same behaviour can be seen in Tamils in Sri Lanka, Tibet where China have invaded, in Hawaii where most of the original people have been displaced as also happened in South America and the West Indies. What happened to Native Americans is well documented as is the displacement of Aborigines and Maoris.
This behaviour of invaders whether invited or not goes back as far as recorded history. Take our own country. Julius Caesar invaded Britain in 53AD with a small Roman force and realised the Britons were not easy so the Romans withdrew to Gaul. They needed more men for full-scale invasion.

Caesar returned the next year bringing 30,000 soldiers. The Britons delayed by not fighting the Romans as they landed which allowed them to establish themselves. Then they fought British tribes one at a time. Caesar neglected Gaul and they rose up so Caesar had to withdraw to put down the rebellion.

The Britons aidded their Celtic kinfolk in Gaul in their fight to defend their territory. Emperor Claudius decreed they should feel the might of Rome.
The Romans invasion of AD 43 was to to take over the island. Emperor Claudius sent an army of 40,000 men. Many tribes realised the power of this army and soon made peace but some took on the might of the Roman army. These clashes lasted for many years in parts of Britain. Rivalry led to war and to the Romans war could only end with the submission or destruction of their foes. In Europe, whole tribes of Gauls, Britons and Germans were killed or enslaved. After the Gauls surrendered Caesar took 50,000 slaves with as many killed. The Gallic warlord Vercingetorix honorably surrendered but was kept in chains for six years before being ritually strangled in the arena. Caesar boasted of killing five million Gauls - an act of genocide.

In Briton the Iceni tribe, an ally of the Romans, was driven to rebellion by the cruelty of the Roman governor. Their tribal lands were seized and people enslaved. Boudicca, their Queen, was publicly whipped and her daughters raped by Roman slaves.

The Celts had coinage no written language, and were divided. The Romans had a developed culture, organisation and great self-belief.They came to conquer and take the people under their authority. It is in this sense that people speak of Liberty: Liberty from foreign yolk and the creative security of living amongst your own folk in your own culture. Compared to the Romans the Celts were disunited. They shared basic race with the Romans but were ethnically different and followed different religions which increases conflict as it does with the rival White and Muslim comminities now.

An ethnicity is a group whose members belong together through a common heritage, usually a common language, a common culture which is a shared religion and sense of common ancestry and awareness of a group's distinctiveness from others. Patrick J.Buchanan describes it as a “blood and soil” nation.(3)

Civilisation broke down after the Roman army left and to defend themselves from Vikings, the inhabitants brought in European mercenaries. These were Angles and Saxons from northern Germany. To begin the Anglo Saxons were allowed to bring their families and got paid with land which they could farm then when they were strong enough the Anglo Saxons took the territory. This is a parallel with how contemporary elites are allowing our territory to be taken and our children dispossessed.

The Anglo Saxon invasion was the most thorough case of ethnic cleansing in this country until 1948. DNA evidence shows that in some parts of the country up to 90% of the inhabitants were displaced. The Anglo Saxons re-named roads and places which shows dominance.

The Viking raids finally became a “Great Army” in 865 AD. It landed in East Anglia and Northumbria and Mercia had fallen by 875 with only Wessex left. The Vikings attack Wessex in 878. By 1016 the Vikings ruled under Cnute. Once again on Cnut's death the country broke down into competing Earldoms under weak king Edward the Confessor. When he died Harold became King.

The Tower of London was built to emphasise the new rulers power and dominance. William had castles. The new landowners built magnificent castles that proclaimed their authority to be obeyed like Warwick and Windsor that survive. Now it is fabulous and dominant mosques and culture centres.

The landed gentry were replaced by Normans who took the best land and any women they wanted: the Anglo Saxon people became their serfs. Only one Anglo-Saxon Bishop was left in office.

We are not supposed to defend ourselves but Muslims are allowed to develop militant and terrorist networks against us. The enemy within, The Equalities and Human Rights Commission have made it illegal for an ethnic or racial nationalist political party to exist in Britain but allow other ethnic groups right of association. (4)

The elites are oppressing us as conquerors do so immigrants replace us. Contemporary Politics is based on racism - the global Establishment pushes relentlessly to displace, dispossess, deracinate the peoples' of Europe THAT is racism. It treats us as not a real people, not worthy of consideration, subhuman.We must be proud of our "racialism" of defending ourselves against dispossession and of being determined to live!

These are the instructions of Bedfordshire Police to officers on anti-terrorist courses:

''UK’s Bedfordshire Police’s rules regarding terrorists and dangerous criminals If they’re non-Muslim.
Consider the most opportune time of day to be able to arrest suspects with minimum resistance. Apply all necessary force to enter the premises and arrest suspects accordingly. If they’re Muslim:
  • Community leaders must be consulted before raids into Muslim houses.
  • Officers must not search occupied bedrooms and bathrooms before dawn.
  • Use of police dogs will be considered serious desecration of the premises.
  • Cameras and camcorders should not be used in case of capturing women inappropriately dressed.
  • If people are praying: home officers should stand aside and not disrupt, They should be allowed the opportunity to finish.
  • Officers should take off their shoes before raiding a Muslim house.
  • The reasons for pre-dawn raids on Muslim houses needs to be clear and transparent.
  • Officers must not touch holy books or religious artefacts without permission.
  • Muslim prisoners should be allowed to take additional clothing to the station.''

Our culture is being changed.

Anjem Choudary has said that under sharia law in Britain people who commit adultery would be stoned to death, adding that “anyone who becomes intoxicated by alcohol would be given 40 lashes in public”. He described an Army homecoming parade a: “vile parade of brutal murderers”.(5)

Meanwhile evil Harriet Harman brings in discriminatory laws and praises immigrants who exploit us by sending money to their own countries.(6)

The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were part of a secret plan by ministers to change the population to "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett. It was done behing our backs to "open up the UK to mass migration." They decieved people with false arguments that immigrants are bringing economic benefits.

A Swedish government minister showed in a radio interview that they are allowing Muslims to take over their country. It's betraying the indigenous population especially the women: The utopian fantasy depends on not seeing Muslims as human like us and wanting revenge for historical reasons against their Christian rivals. “We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us.”

Immigrants are consciousness of their strength and knowingly taking our territory and establishing their symbols of conquest like mosques and education centres. These are alien bulkheads in our civilisation and used to develop a new generation of street soldiers with the right mentality.

The important point in assessing the true nature of immigration is how are the immigrants behaving: this is not to be seen as on a par with our people's criminal behaviour because the immigrants treat us as other and also have grudges against us for the way we treated them when we were conquerers. It is not the fault of poor whites but they are the only ones the immigrants can get as the elites are happily rich in safe places.

The other way of assessing whether this is immigration or invasion is to consider their attitude to us. The widespread mass child-rapes of our young girls is guerilla warfare: fighting us by other means.

In Pakistanis in Britain: The Second Generation Allison Shaw studied the Pakistani community in Oxford(1988) The third generation of British Pakistanis is now grown up and claiming our territory and taking young British women as booty. Shaw shows the relative loyalties to one's own kind of the Pakistanis and the English. The Pakistanis are extended families, the English atomised and anomic.

From Alison Shaw, A Pakistani Community in Britain (Blackwell Ltd., Oxford, 1988):
[…] These young men are westernized in that they are fluent in English, interested in western music and Sport, and comfortable in English company, where they move with a sophistication that their parents lack. What does this imply about their attitudes to their family and biradari?

It is striking that young men such as these retain very strong social and financial links with their families; even those who live and work away from Oxford come home whenever they can and hope to get work locally when the opportunity arises. These young men tend to spend their leisure time with each other and their peers within the community rather than with English friends and also participate in family and community social events.
A woman gave this account of the punishments for failing to follow rules:
The Prophet Mohammed was out walking one day when he saw a woman in torture, hanging by her hair, but still alive. A little further on, he saw a woman being hung by her breasts and then he saw a woman being put into a huge fire, screaming. Horrified, he asked Allah, ‘Why are these women being tortured like this? Please let them go free!’ But Allah replied, ‘The first woman used to tantalize men with her hair, the second used to reveal her breasts to strange men and the third slept with a man who was not her husband. That is why I cannot set them free.
At the same time it is considered that women must be protected because they are the dependants of men. .

The corollary of this is that a woman who is ‘outside’, among men, unprotected, is ‘free for anyone to take.’ Western women in particular appear to break all the rules of purdah. They are regarded as sexually promiscuous, moving freely from one man to another, behaving and dressing in order to provoke men. A woman out alone is in effect asking for sexual relations with a man. Rape, young and older men have insisted, is always the woman’s fault, because it is the natural result of a woman dressing provocatively and being out alone. In this view, western women are simultaneously exciting and despised for having no sense of shame and being ‘used by more than one man; like prostitutes’. ’


One young man said:
The point is, English girls don’t mind; there’s no restriction for them. In fact, they chase you and laugh at you if you don’t go with them. It was like that at school: the girls chasing men. I know I shouldn’t have, it’s against our religion, but how could I refuse? It’s natural for a man to feel like that; you can’t really avoid it. I blame the western system.
Almost all of the unmarried men among the young adults surveyed above have had clandestine relationships with English girls, yet do not feel that this contradicts their acceptance of an arranged marriage or the Islamic moral code. It is tacitly accepted by most men and women that men will have girlfriends because ‘men are like that’ and because English girls are easily available ...

I would like to thank the owner of the blog for introducing me to the books of Alison Shaw

(1)Death of the West.Patrick J.Buchanan.


(3) State of Emergency.Patrick J.Buchanan (Thomas Dunne Books)